The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-finding (with regard to a special assault) the Defendant: (a) committed an act in a manner that goes against the Defendant’s boat by taking a shoulderphone at the time; and (b) stated in the facts charged, the Defendant told the victim I to “a house”; (c) there was no shot in one arms, such as the facts charged, and there was no shot in the items of the victim’s neck or a shot view; and (d) the victim’s statement that conforms to the facts charged is not reliable.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an additional collection of KRW 400,000,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

가. 사실 오인 주장에 대하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 이 사건 당시 피해자를 촬영한 사진의 영상에 의하면 피해자의 목 부위에 붉게 부어오른 상처가 있음이 확인되고, 그 부위에 비추어 볼 때 이와 같은 상처는 타인의 가해 행위로 인한 것이라고 봄이 합리적인 점, ② 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 이 부분 공소사실에 부합되게 진술하였고, 피고인 스스로도 검찰에서 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 팔로 피해자의 목을 감싸고 깨뜨린 유리조각을 피해 자의 목에 들이댔다고

In full view of the facts stated, this part of the facts charged can be fully recognized, so the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. As to the unfair argument of sentencing, the defendant recognized the remaining crimes except for those of special assault, and expressed that the victim I sought the defendant's preference at an investigative agency, and there are extenuating circumstances to consider the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim J at the original trial.

However, the crime of this case, after the defendant administered a philophone, purchased a philophone and administered it, delivered a philophone without compensation to I, and damaged the property by taking the philophone into account.