A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 23:17, at the front of the Jeju-si parking lot, was to drive away the previous female-friendly house; and (b) the Defendant was to receive a report on 112 pertaining to the transfer violence at his seat, and was dispatched to the site from E (51) in the Jeju-si Police Station D District Unit at the Jeju-si Police Station, which was dispatched to the site, carried a rear-down engine of the said vehicle; and (c) approximately 30 cm after a large amount of 30 cm, carried the front left hand of the said vehicle, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by carrying dangerous items into the concrete columns adjacent to the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. A statement prepared in the F;

1. To enter into an investigation report prepared by the police (verification as to whether any injury is injured);

1. Application of each of the related visual Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 【The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of applicable sentences 50,000 won to a fine of 15 million won or more: Violence against police officials is deemed to be an unjustifiable challenge against the State’s public authority; Defendant used a motor vehicle dangerous to exercise the direct tangible power on the body of the victimized police officer; Defendant’s use of a motor vehicle; Defendant’s use of a motor vehicle, which is a dangerous article; Defendant’s use of a motor vehicle, is unfortunateed from the victimized police officer; Defendant appears to have recognized the Defendant’s mistake; Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime by interesting in dispute with the former female-friendly Gu while the Defendant took a hand-off exemption.