A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2018, the Defendant reported on November 19, 2018, 01:20, 112 on the street front of the B hotel in Jeju Island, that “A taxi has been taken in the taxi,” and was arrested as an offender in the crime of assault by taking the face of the police officer belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station C District of the Jeju Police Station, which called “A taxi is taken in the taxi,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the investigation of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Statement made by the police about D's written statement; and

1. Entry of the E-document;

1. Entry of a report processing list of 112 reported cases prepared by the police;

1. Application of each of the related visual Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 【The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of the sentence to be sentenced under the law】 Fine of 50,000 won to 10,000 won: Violence against police officers is deemed to be an unjustifiable challenge against the national public authority; circumstances favorable for the defendant to the point that the defendant was unable to be used by the victimized police officer; the defendant was found to have committed a mistake in this court; the defendant was arrested by the police officer and was able to find the defendant guilty; the under the influence of alcohol was arrested by the police officer; the defendant was in contact with the face of the victimized police officer while the defendant was laid down down at the bottom of the floor; the damage caused by the crime of this case is minor; the defendant was issued with the violation of the Automobile Management Act of 2010 and the violation of the Road Traffic Act of 200, and there was no criminal record other than the issuance of the summary order; the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive and consequence of the crime, etc.