A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on May 30, 2010 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million at the Incheon District Court on June 28, 2010), driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on May 8, 2012 (the issuance of a summary order of KRW 2 million at the gender support of the Daegu District Court on June 5, 2012), and violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

On October 18, 2018, the Defendant driven a car with sofried from C to C, in the e-mail Eup industrial complex in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the e-mail city in the vicinity of the e-mail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a report on the arrest of a case;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a copy of a summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant, who had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had to

I seem to appear.

However, it is ordered as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: the Defendant recognized the instant crime and divided his mistake; the Defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a punishment heavier than a suspended sentence until now; and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the record.