1. The Defendant’s KRW 47,838,93 and each of the said money to Plaintiff A from April 5, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) D is a motor vehicle of the EP (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 10:00 on April 5, 2015, around 10:00.

(ii) while driving a vehicle and turn to the left at the left of the area of an implied apartment 76,00,000 which is in the direction of the running of the vehicle, the Gale vehicle of the F Driving (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”) which is proceeding with the said intersection by keeping it to the left at the left of the area of the front of the implied apartment 76,00,000 square meters in the direction of the running of the vehicle, due to the negligence of not operating the steering side well, and of not operating the steering direction and brake system properly.

) The left-hand wheel part of the Defendant vehicle’s left-hand wheel part is the front part of the Defendant vehicle’s right-hand part, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was transferred due to its shock, and then conflict with the H driver’s I rocketing car running on the opposite side, and the network J (hereinafter “the network”).

) The death of the deceased (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 6 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. According to the evidence incurred prior to the limitation of liability and the statement of No. 6-16 (Statement of Plaintiff B), it is reasonable to view that the deceased is the actual operator of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident, since it is recognized that the deceased was the husband of Plaintiff A, the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the actual operator of the Plaintiff vehicle, who was on the part of the Plaintiff

The operator of a vehicle shall pay due attention from the selection of the driver to the direction and supervision of the driver.