1. The Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor

1. The following facts may be found either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole in the statements in Gap evidence 1 to 16 (including each number, if any, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 4, 7, 10, 12, Eul evidence 1, 1, 2, and 7.

On July 31, 1935, “H and five persons,” and “G, and other 37 persons,” on April 18, 1940, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in sequence with respect to F forest land 40,066 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si. The joint seal list prepared by Book No. 4 Book No. 147 was filed around June 25, 199, and the said register was destroyed on December 31, 192.

The owner of the current forest land in this case is also the state of unexploited state in the blank.

B. On the other hand, the forest tax stating the forest tax on the instant land is indicated as “non-H and five persons,” and the 1,190 square meters (one single 2 square meters) out of the instant land is divided into a reserved forest on September 7, 1936 (Provided, That no separate lot number is set) and as to the remaining 38,876 square meters (three thousand 38,876 square meters and two 36 square meters) out of the instant land except the said reserved forest, the “non-party,” purchased on April 18, 1940, indicated as a new taxpayer, and indicated as a co-owner of the said land in the public land list, G and other 37 co-owners, etc. as co-owners.

C. As to the instant land, H is indicated as its owner in the protocol of incorporation into a reserved forest drawn up on July 15, 1935.

On the other hand, on September 7, 1936, concerning the first and second class of the land in this case, the local government official document was implemented to be enlisted into a reserved forest as the J of the Joseon General Government of the Gyeonggi-do.

H, who is liable for duty payment, died on March 8, 1951 and succeeded to Australia, who is a child, and G died on June 21, 2016.

5 successors of G, including the plaintiffs, are the land in this case.