The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the first instance judgment (the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the annexed Table No. 1 of the crime committed in the judgment of the first instance) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is that the defendant divided the crime of this case into two separates and reflects on the crime of this case, and his spirit and treatment continue to be sustained.

The fact that the victim has agreed to pay 3 million won to the victim, and the crime of the crime of the crime of the attached Table 1 and 2 in the judgment of the court of first instance is in the relation of larceny for which the judgment has become final and the crime of the crime of the attached Table 1 and 2 is in the relation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Code and the crime of the crime of the attached Table 1 and 2,

On the other hand, the defendant has been sentenced three times to a fine due to the same crime, and one time to a suspended sentence, as well as the fact that the defendant has committed the larceny crime repeatedly over six times during the suspended sentence period is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the first instance judgment against the Defendant does not seem to be unfair because the sentencing of the Defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.