logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.30 2017노2756
특수절도미수등
Text

The judgment below

Of the 2-A of the decision of the court below, each of the crimes No. 1, No. 36,37, and No. 3 are included in the list of crimes as stated in the judgment of the court below.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court: (a) the Defendant is sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the following crimes: (i) each of the crimes listed in paragraph (1) through 35 of the first instance judgment; (ii) the crimes listed in paragraph (1) through 2-A; (b) each of the crimes listed in paragraph (3); (iii) the crimes listed in paragraph (1) through 5, each of the crimes listed in paragraph (3); (iv) the crimes listed in paragraph (5); (vi) the crimes listed in paragraph (9) (hereinafter referred to as “each of the crimes listed in paragraph (1); and (iii) the crimes listed in paragraph (1) and 36 and 37, each of the crimes listed in the first instance judgment among the crimes listed in paragraph (3) of the second judgment; and (iii) the net crimes listed in paragraph (3) of the second judgment; and

A. and (c) Each of the crimes listed in paragraph (5) and each of the crimes listed in paragraph (4) 2 or 4 (hereinafter referred to as "each of the crimes listed in paragraph (2) of this case") listed in the holding of the court below shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and the defendant shall be exempted from punishment for the crimes listed in paragraph 4-b (b) listed in the holding of the court below.

B. On this point, the defendant asserts that the above punishment sentenced by the court below (4 months of imprisonment and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment sentenced by the court below (4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor) and the defendant were exempted from some punishment (as to the crime of Article 4-B of the decision of the court below as to the crime of Article 4-B of the decision of the court below) are too un

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's mistake of each of the crimes of this case, the fact that some victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, and the crime of this case No. 1 is committed against the defendant for whom the judgment was made on August 2, 2016, and the crime of this case No. 4-B of the judgment of the court below, and the crime of this case is committed against the defendant for whom the judgment was made on December 3, 2014, and the crime of this case is committed against the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against the defendant for whom the judgment was made on December 3, 2014 and the crime of this case No. 4-B of the judgment of the court below, each of which should be considered for the equality

On the other hand.

arrow