logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.04.16 2012고단10642
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act is to receive 1 million won per month from D, which was known to the general public on December 2, 2011, on the condition that he/she lends his/her name in the operation of a game room to the Busan-gu E Gameland, on the condition that he/she registers the name in lieu of the name in Busan-gu E Gameland, and the same year from around May 23, 2012;

8. Until December 13, 198, the defendant operated the above game room in the name of the defendant instead of D, and D operated the above game room to exchange books, which is the result of playing the game to many unspecified customers who found 50 games in the above game room, after setting up 50 games in the above game room.

The Defendant assisted and abetted D to exchange the act by allowing D to operate a speculative game room business while avoiding the police control over the unemployment week in the above manner.

2. The Defendant also received the request from D to the police for an investigation on behalf of the unemployment of the said game room, between August 24, 2012 and August 26, 2012, when E Gameland was under the control of the police, as seen above, the Defendant had lent the name of the E Gameland. From August 25 to 26, 2012, the Defendant received the request from D for an investigation on behalf of the unemployment of the said game room.

On August 27, 2012, the Defendant, at the Busan Regional Police Agency’s office and the office of living order division, was investigated as criminal facts in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, such as the operation of the game in the above E-Gameland and the alteration of the game machine, and, in order for a person who actually operated the above game room to be aware of D to avoid criminal punishment, he/she made a false statement to D who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by making a false statement as if he/she actually operated the above game room, so that D would not be subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. As a result of the appraisal by the Game Rating Board (Seong Daejeon 3);

arrow