1. The instant lawsuit was concluded on December 2, 2015 when the payment order in the instant case was finalized on December 2, 2015.

2.

Basic Facts

On October 7, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for a payment order against the Defendant under this Court No. 2015 tea10888, and issued a payment order on October 15, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant payment order”). On November 17, 2015, the Defendant received the original copy of the instant payment order from the said workplace on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant completed its business registration under the trade name “D” at the location of Busan Staff-gu C (hereinafter “instant workplace”); and (b) E, who is an office worker or employee of the said workplace, received the original copy of the instant payment order from the said workplace.

On May 11, 2016, the Defendant submitted a subsequent supplement of the instant payment order after the lapse of 14 days thereafter.

(2) According to the reasoning of the lower court’s judgment, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the filing of an objection against the Defendant’s living together with the Defendant. In so doing, it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the filing of an objection against the Defendant, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the filing of an objection against the Defendant’s living together with the Defendant, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the filing of an objection, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

In conclusion, the instant lawsuit was concluded upon the completion of the instant payment order on December 2, 2015, and thus, the Defendant’s objection of this case is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.