logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2017가단94097
대여금
Text

1. The lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A is an order for payment issued by this Court No. 2017 tea35997 on August 18, 2017.

Reasons

1. Lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A

A. On July 13, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a payment order against the Defendants under this Court 2017 tea35997, and issued the instant payment order on July 24, 2017. On August 3, 2017, the office staff C of the Defendant Company received the original of the instant payment order on August 3, 2017 at the domicile of the principal office. The Defendant Company A filed a written objection on October 12, 2017 more than 14 days prior to the filing period of the objection.

In addition, there is no evidence to find otherwise that the defendant A could not observe the time limit for filing an objection due to any reason not attributable to the defendant A.

B. Therefore, the part of the instant payment order against Defendant A among the instant payment order is terminated by the confirmation on August 18, 2017, and the objection raised by Defendant A Co., Ltd. is dismissed.

2. In full view of the Plaintiff’s claims No. 1 and No. 4, the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant B, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it can be acknowledged that the reasons for the application of the attached Form (However, the obligee’s “Plaintiff” and “debtor” are considered as the Defendant) are written in the attached Form.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in Paragraph 3 of this Article to the plaintiff.

arrow