A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The telephone financial fraud organization, which is active in China, is composed of inducements made up of capable persons in Korean language, the total amount of withdrawals ordering the withdrawal of the transferred amount of damage, the withdrawals made out of the cash payment machine from financial institutions, and the deliverys which receive the amount of damage from the cash payment machine and deliver the amount of damage to the total amount of withdrawals.

On May 2015, “C” et al.: (a) “C” et al. was the total of the withdrawals of the telephone financial fraud organization; (b) the Defendant was engaged in the role of monitoring the withdrawals of telephone financial fraud at the expense of 2% of the damage amount by monitoring “C” from “C” to prevent the Defendant from escaping with money; and (c) was engaged in the act of monitoring the withdrawals of telephone financial fraud; and (d) persons whose name is not known, “C” et al., the total of withdrawals, and “C” et al., the delivery books, and other persons whose name is not known and who committed the crime of telephone financial fraud.

On June 29, 2015, a person whose name is the incentive for the aforementioned telephone financial fraud organization may obtain a loan by 3.5% per annum from the victim E (FF agency, FC mortgage loan). A loan may be obtained by raising the credit rating by means of raising the credit rating until the lapse of the period when the head of the Tong was inserted in order to continue the loan. However, the person sent by the head of the Tong and the card with the head of the Tong and the head of the Tong present the passbook and find money deposited by the head of the Tong.”

However, in fact, the above telephone financial fraud assistance staff and the defendant obtained a passbook, card, etc. under the victim's name and tried to use it to transfer the amount of damage from the telephone financial fraud to many and unspecified persons, but did not have the intent or ability to get the victim loaned.

around July 2, 2015, the Defendant, together with D, who was bound to withdraw from “C”, is a passbook in the name of the victim.