The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 17:0 on March 11, 2015, on the road side of the E District located in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) opened approximately 0.5g g of Meptotop (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”); (c) transferred KRW 150,000 to the account of G Nonghyup Bank in the name of G, the Defendant used to sell philopon; (d) around March 12, 2015.

2. On May 22, 2015, the Defendant, at around 13:00 around May 22, 2015, 2015, sold phiphones by receiving KRW 100,00 of the price from the Defendant’s Saemaul Bank of Korea, to the Defendant’s Saemaul Bank of Korea, using 16:00 on the same day.

2. Determination

A. F’s statement that seems to correspond to the facts charged is difficult to believe for the following reasons.

① As indicated in the first prosecutor’s account transaction details, F stated in the prosecutor’s office that “The purchase from the Defendant for KRW 150,000 or KRW 100,000,000,000 or KRW 1,500,000,000 or KRW 1,000,000,000 or KRW 1,000,000 or KRW 1,000,000, or KRW 200,000, or KRW 1,000,000, or KRW 200,000, or KRW 1,000, or KRW 1,000, or KRW 2,000, or KRW 1,000, or KRW 1,00,00, or KRW 2,000, or

② At the prosecutor’s office, F refers to “the defendant has to purchase” the prosecutor’s office.

If a promise place is determined and a written transaction is made, the reason for paying the writingphones by means of account transfer, not cash, is that it is paid in this court.