logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.12.19 2014노2617
청소년보호법위반등
Text

The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant A and B shall be reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,00.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

A (unfair imprisonment) The sentence imposed by the court below on Defendant A (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Defendant

B (M) Defendant B is the owner of the “OEM”, but there was no main point at the time of committing the instant crime. Therefore, the lower court found Defendant B guilty of the instant facts charged even though there was no intent to commit the instant crime, and thereby, erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Defendant

The judgment of the court below which found Defendant C guilty of the facts charged in this case by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, on the ground that Defendant C was not the operator of “N,” but the actual owner of the business, and confirmed that he was not a minor by being presented an identification card from the juvenile at the time, and thus, he was not a minor.

Defendant

D (In fact or misunderstanding of legal principles) The judgment of the court below which found Defendant D guilty of the facts charged in this case, despite the absence of intention to employ juveniles in entertainment tavern because it confirmed that Defendant D was not a minor by presenting an identification card from juveniles, was erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

Defendant

A Defendant A not only employed victims who are juveniles as entertainment service establishments, but also threatened them to commit violence while placing them in his house. The nature of the crime is very heavy.

However, when the defendant was found to have committed each of the crimes in this case, the defendant's attitude to reflect is shown to be the first offender, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime are committed.

arrow