logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.11.01 2019나53320
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the Orcheon-gu E Apartment F (hereinafter “instant apartment F”) and is also residing in G G and the above apartment F with mental fission disorder 3.

B. Defendant B is the owner of the above E Apartment H (hereinafter “instant apartment H”) and Defendant C is the wife of Defendant B, and Defendant D is the mother of Defendant B, and the Defendants were also residing in the instant apartment H.

C. At around 20:00 on July 4, 2016, the Plaintiff’s G got out of the instant apartment Nos. 200, and the Plaintiff attempted to extinguish the fire but did not extinguish due to interference with G and reported to the fire station.

The above fire was transferred to H of the apartment apartment of this case where the Defendants were residing, and thereby, the Defendants’ home tools were destroyed or damaged (hereinafter “the fire of this case”), and Defendant C and D received emergency treatment at the I Hospital by inhaleing the smoke of fire.

On December 27, 2016, the Defendants filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff and G seeking medical expenses and property damages incurred from the instant fire (Yancheon District Court Branch Decision 2016Kadan120986), and partially accepted judgment on July 6, 2017.

With respect to this, the plaintiff (A) and the defendant B appealed (In Incheon District Court 2017Na60959) and the appellate court rendered a judgment that partially accepted the appeal of the defendant B on April 4, 2018 (recognition of damages in property).

As to the above appellate judgment, the Plaintiff (A) re-appeals (Supreme Court Decision 2018Da228486) and is currently pending in the final appeal.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant lawsuit”). 【No dispute exists concerning the instant lawsuit” (based on recognition), Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendants are forced to threaten the Plaintiff on the grounds that the instant fire ought to undergo artificial insemination.

arrow