beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00,000, while punished by imprisonment of eight months.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a Korean national of Chinese nationality, and Defendant B is a child of Defendant A as a person of naturalization from a Chinese shipbuilding unit.
1. Although Defendant A intended to apply for naturalization for the purpose of permanently residing in the Republic of Korea, around July 2012, Defendant A, who had been declared to have been sentenced to imprisonment for fraud in the court which claimed that a suit was filed by both China around July 2012, and thus was unable to obtain a certificate of non-crime necessary for filing an application for naturalization, Defendant A, along with Defendant B, urged Defendant B to apply for naturalization after forging the said document.
Since then, on March 2016, Defendant B asked Defendant A to forge the above certificate of non-crime by phoneing it to Defendant B, who is his pro-Japanese, in China, in the middle of March 2016.
D A. A. A. B. A. B. B. request a non-disscriptive business operator in China to reissue the aforesaid non-criminal certificate, and accordingly, the forged business operator stated “A”, “E”, “E”, and “F” in the name of the country of public security in the Chinese route, and affixed his/her seal on the Chinese roadside map.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with D and non-disscriptive business operators in order, and forged one copy of the certificate of non-crime under the name of the public security country in China, which is a private document about fact certification, for the purpose of uttering in order.
2. On May 3, 2016, the Defendants, who interfered with the exercise of the above investigation documents and the execution of fraudulent means, received forged non-crime certificates as referred to in paragraph 1 from D. After applying for naturalization to Defendant A at the office of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul Immigration Control Office around May 3, 2016, provided that a public official in charge of not knowing the forgery of the falsified certificate was accepted as a document as if the document was duly formed, and then had a public official belonging to the department in charge of naturalization of the Seoul Immigration Control Office examine it.