logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고정1188
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in the duty of driving Cren car.

On April 29, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 08:55, and proceeded with the road of 97-1 Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Gwangju, Dong-dong, about 40km each hour from Dong-dong to Dong-dong.

At that place, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing speed and checking the side well, and to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the traffic signal in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed in violation of the signal while the signal is changed to a stop signal.

From the right side of the proceeding to the left side of the victim D(63 years of age, south) driving by the victim D (63 years of age, south) who is driving in the intersection in accordance with the new line, collisioned into the front side of the defendant's vehicle and the front part

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's negligence in the course of his duties the salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that vehicles of the defendant are covered by comprehensive insurance, the degree of damage to the victim is relatively little, and the living environment of the defendant is above the above mentioned.

arrow