logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.20 2015가단5302614
양수금
Text

1. As to KRW 112,094,837 and KRW 32,036,636 among the Plaintiff, Defendant A shall be from December 17, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Claim against the defendant A;

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the attached Form;

(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').

Article 208 (3) 3 of Civil Procedure Act)

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, on September 7, 2004, jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant A’s loan obligation of KRW 38 million against Defendant Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff transferred the above loan obligation against Defendant Samsung Card Co., Ltd. from Samsung Card Co., Ltd., but the Plaintiff’s transfer of the above loan obligation against the Defendant Samsung Card Co., Ltd. is alleged as having acquired the above loan obligation from Defendant Samsung Card Co., Ltd., however, the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 4 (Agreement on High-Tech Installment Financing) cannot be used as evidence since there is no evidence to acknowledge the establishment of the authenticity.

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is dismissed for reasons.

arrow