logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.05.19 2016고단90
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On November 7, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of road traffic law (driving alcohol) at the Cheongju District Court, and on October 15, 2010, a summary order of three million won for the same crime was issued by the Suwon District Court for the same offense.

[Criminal facts]

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the aforementioned punishment had been imposed on more than two occasions, Defendant 1 driven CK 3 automobiles under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.190% at a section of approximately 200 meters at the same time via the convenience store in the day, starting from the 1320-21 East apartment underground parking lot as of December 19, 2015, according to the safe and opcognability of 1320-21 as of December 19, 2015.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle CK3 in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury prior to the risk).

On December 19, 2015, the Defendant came to turn to the left from the front door of the 1320-21 East apartment complex to the lower surface of the underground parking lot, according to the safe and visual dancing around 21:45.

At the time and where the place is located in an apartment complex, it has a duty of care to safely drive a vehicle and a person engaged in driving a vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the part of the body part of the victim D(38 tax) where the entrance of the underground parking lot was at the entrance of the entrance from the 102-side bank to the 102-side bank, due to the negligence of blocking the flow of alcohol content by 0.190% under influence of alcohol during blood, and went beyond the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury, such as double walls, sprinking, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;

arrow