logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.07.20 2017고단605
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant agreed to receive a loan fee of three million won per head of Tong at the public parking lot for the river of the 3-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written petition and written confirmation of transfer;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the account leased by the Defendant was actually used for the criminal act of phishing fraud, and it was not clearly known that the transaction of passbook was used for the criminal act of phishing fraud, the necessity for strict punishment, the fact that the account was not used for the criminal act of phishing, the fact that the profit was not acquired, and the fact that the account was divided.

arrow