Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on “E” restaurant located in Ma-Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si; and (b) continued to interfere with the victim; and

Along to the end of the police, the victim committed an indecent act by force against the victim by using the victim's chest flick at a canter."

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Witness F’s testimony [The defendant and his defense counsel argued to the effect that the defendant was satisfing the victim’s chest, but the victim’s chest was not forced to use the victim’s chest on a canter, and that there was no indecent act by force. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court are consistent in the investigation agency and this court, i.e., the victim’s statement to the effect that “the victim” is “the victim’s “s satisf sat”, and the victim’s statement to the effect that “the victim satisf sat.”

Although the defendant made a statement to the effect that "," he was able to find the victim's chest by his hand at a canter.

Specifically, the above victim's statement is reliable; ② in this court of law the witness G, the defendant stated to the effect that the victim's chest was not taken at the time of the instant case, thereby complying with the above argument by the defendant. However, the witness G's above statement does not coincide with the investigative agency's statement; and further, "the defendant did not want the victim at the time."

In full view of the fact that some of the contents of the statement including the statement made to the effect that it is difficult to believe it because it does not coincide with the Defendant’s statement, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by turning the victim’s chest on the victim’s chest.

Therefore, the above argument shall not be accepted.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;