The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was the Vice-Chairperson of the Korean Seniors Association. On January 2018, 2018, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “D sold the rice of the Korean Seniors Association to the Korean Seniors Association without having sold the rice of the Korean Seniors Association.”

2. In light of the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor cannot be deemed as having been proven beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant damaged the reputation of the defendant as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

① The Defendant’s words “the injured party sold rice 17 million won per 1st century” can be interpreted as “the injured party took profits, such as taking advantage of the profits by selling rice or taking back the proceeds therefrom,” or “the injured party has sold rice without permission from the Senior Citizens’ Association.” The Defendant consistently from the investigative agency to this court and consistently stated that “the injured party has paid the proceeds to the Senior Citizens’ Association, not by embezzlement or using the rice at will, but by paying the proceeds to the Senior Citizens’ Association. However, the Defendant sold the rice at 1.20,00 won per 1stma market price, causing damage to the Senior Citizens’ Association, and there is no fact that the injured party has obtained permission from the Senior Citizens’ Association or notified in advance, and there is no reason to interpret that the injured party embezzled the proceeds of selling the said horses at a specific place, and thus, the purport of the Defendant’s speech to the effect that the Defendant’s horses sold the rice without permission from the Senior Citizens’ Association is interpreted as lawful.”

(2) A defendant shall file a formal objection with an investigative agency.