1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From June 23, 1990, the Plaintiff (the 54 years of age, male) served as a public official in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and from September 1, 2009 to June 13, 2017, the Civil Judicial Police Team served as a local administrative assistant (class 6).

Non-party B (the 37 years of age, women, hereinafter referred to as "non-party B") served as a Grade 6 investigator from January 2016 to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Private Judicial Police Group.

B. On November 13, 2017, the First Personnel Committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: (a) laid the gum in the inside of the Non-Party working in the same department at around 18:20 of the retirement route on June 7, 2017; (b) tried to remove the Non-Party’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herbbbbs, etc., or to remove the her her her her her her her her her her she

C. The Defendant is against the Plaintiff on December 12, 2017.

For the same reasons as stated in subsection (d), one-month disciplinary action of salary reduction was taken (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).

On December 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a petition review seeking the revocation of the instant disciplinary action, but the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Appeals Commission decided to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim on February 1, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disciplinary action is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s instant disciplinary action should be revoked on the following grounds.

1) The Plaintiff did not contact the Nonparty’s body and did not engage in improper speech and behavior. Therefore, there is no ground for the instant disciplinary action. (2) The Plaintiff has discretion.