The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who imports and sells frozen agricultural and livestock products from foreign countries, or engages in wholesale and relay trade for exporting them to their original state with the trade name "F" in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

No one may export or sell goods, etc. produced in a foreign country under the pretending that the country of origin is Korea by forging or altering a certificate of origin, obtaining a certificate of origin with any false content, or falsely indicating the country of origin of goods, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on May 14, 2013, entered the Chinese freezing Corresponding from the F’s name into the Busan Customs Office, and subsequently declared to the customs office to export it to the United States as it is in its original condition (reported number G), and attempted to export the country of origin to the Republic of Korea by falsely marking the origin on the inner package of the said Chinese freezing 1,091CT (FRD 71,142, 76,972,906 won in reported price, and the customs code) in the manner of indicating the origin “PRDUT OFCHA” and “Korea.”

2. Determination

A. The gist of the Defendant’s change of the domicile (hereinafter “H”) exported to R.W. International Tring Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “R.W. Co., Ltd.”) and imported into Korea in the form of lending the name of the Defendant’s business operator, and exported to the United States. The Defendant was only involved in the document agency business for export, and the Defendant manufactured a package package of the B/L as indicated in the judgment, and marked the origin of the C/L on the grounds that the Defendant did not have participated in the manufacturing process, and that the origin of the C/L was indicated in Korea.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted by this Court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is false as indicated in the judgment of the Defendant.