The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is advantageous to the fact that the victims of the crime of damage to public goods, the attempted property damage, and the crime of damage to property in the judgment of the court below have recovered from the damage to public goods, the attempted property damage and the crime of damage to property are not punished by the defendant, and the crime is against the defendant.

However, while being investigated due to the above crimes of damage to public goods or the attempted crimes of damage to each property, the crime of damage to property and interference with the execution of official duties in the judgment below is committed, the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not less than that of the crime, several criminal records are committed, and each of the crimes of this case is committed during the suspension period of execution of imprisonment due to violent crimes is disadvantageous.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the motive and background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the previous theories, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.