1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On April 19, 2015, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) lent KRW 35,00,000 to the Defendant on December 31, 2018, with a maturity of KRW 5% per annum; (b) on the condition that (c) the Plaintiff was employed as the employee of the Defendant; and (d) B retired from the Defendant on February 16, 2016; and (c) accordingly, the period of repayment for the said loan has arrived; and (d) the Defendant is obligated to refund the said loan and the damages for delay to the Plaintiff.

2. According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 3 evidence, even though the Plaintiff leased KRW 35,00,000 to the Defendant on April 19, 2015 at the rate of 5% per annum, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant provided the condition that the Plaintiff would continue to work as Defendant employees or that the repayment period for the above loan obligation has arrived, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.