A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Definite at C convenience stores located in Seopo-si B on October 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) “Infinite by a main agent” was sent to the site after receiving a report 112; and (b) the Defendant was on the part of the victim E, while the employees of convenience stores, etc. who are required to return home from the private victim E at the site of Seopo-si Police Station D, the Defendant was on the part of the victim; (c)

C. The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, chch bitch bitch chom.”

2. On October 19, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) at the Seopo-si D District District of the Seopo-si Police Station D, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, where G was transferred to the said district, for the purpose of cutting off and moving the Defendant’s locks, which he had been transferred to the said district, at the D District District of the Seopo-si Police Station D, Seopo-si.

“In doing so, the part of the right frame of patrolmen G interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigations and maintenance of order by police officials at the same time.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to a photograph of the suspect's head of the crime);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the protection and observation, the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, various conditions of sentencing specified in the instant argument are considered. In particular, the following circumstances should be considered: (a) reflects the favorable circumstances; (b) there is no previous record of interference with the performance of official duties; (c) an act that disregards public authority, such as the discovery of police officers in a district zone, is serious; and (d) a crime of insulting a police officer, such as abusiveing a police officer; and (e) a person is subject to punishment on several occasions due to drinking and non-