Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant confirmed that C and the injured person were in the F private house located in the former Northan Army E while making a suspicion that C and the injured person D are in in an inhuman relationship with each other for a long time, and in order to find evidence of the inhuman relationship, he/she stolen chips installed on the victim’s vehicle in order to find out evidence of the inhuman relationship.

On December 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) cut off the instant victim’s G chip, which was parked in the front of the F private gambling house on a non-time basis; (b) opened the door of the instant victim’s G chip and was attached in the vehicle in a non-fluoring manner; and (c) cut off the chip equivalent to KRW 20,000,000 in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. D Legal statements;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of H concerning H;

1. The chief of the accusation (the above evidence and records, i.e., the following circumstances revealed by the defendant, i.e., ① even if it is assumed that C had the intent to confirm the privacy of D as the defendant's assertion, he/she shall cut chips from the above Badi vehicles to confirm the contents of chips in the private house with D.

It is difficult to believe that the Defendant had been able to believe in light of logical and empirical rules that it is difficult for police officers to believe in light of logical and empirical rules, ② at the site of the instant case where the police officers were damp for the purpose of detection, ② the size of one-lane chips not discovered even after the police officers completed the search, was very small, and that the size of one-lane chips (for the Defendant’s expression, the degree of hand-top size, the size of 10m x 15m x 1m m m) in the trial board is extremely small, and the size of chips in the trial board is very small, and it is difficult for the Defendant to believe that it was difficult for the Defendant to see that he was difficult for him to see. ③ Furthermore, at the police investigation stage, the Gu or the Defendant was s

In the investigation stage of the prosecution, it was hard to say that the room has been closed in the gap.

the statement, etc. is not consistent with the statement, ④ was made at the site of the case.

H is based on the fact that chips were sought at the time.