logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.05.14 2013고단741
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on May 30, 2013, a member of the Suwon District Court sentenced two years to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) in a member of the Pyeongtaek District Court on the same year.

6.8. The judgment became final and conclusive on March 28, 2013. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment in April 5, 2013 due to a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) in the same court on March 28, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 19, 2013, by being sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the same court on November 27, 2013.

『2013고단741』- (피고인 A) 피고인은 D과 공동하여 2013. 4. 8. 19:10경 평택시 이충동에 있는 반지산 화장실 부근에서, 피고인은 피해자 E(17세)에게 인상을 쓰면서 “누구를 찾고 있는데 같이 찾아보자, 못 찾으면 아는 형을 시켜서 가만히 안 두겠다, 전화 한통만 하게 핸드폰 줘봐” 라고 말하여 마치 휴대전화기를 주지 않으면 위해를 가할 것처럼 행동하여 이에 겁을 먹은 피해자로부터 그 자리에서 피해자 소유의 시가 94만 원 상당의 갤럭시S3 휴대전화기 1대를 교부받고, D은 피고인이 피해자의 휴대전화기를 갈취하는 동안 피해자의 일행들을 다른 쪽으로 불러 세워놓고 감시하였다.

As a result, the defendant was given property by assaulting the victim jointly with D.

"2014 Highest 11"

1. Defendant A

A. On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained a driver’s license with the victim F’s name in the Seo-si, Seo-si’s west-dong; (b) did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the victim to the victim; and (c) embezzled the Defendant on his/her thought that he/she had.

B. Around December 9, 2012, the Defendant forcedd the Defendant to follow the direction to the victim G (the age of 18) who is taking the Defendant into consideration in the vicinity of the shot-dong, Pyeongtaek-si. The Defendant seems to have shown that the Defendant would be able to follow the direction to the victim G (the age of 18).

arrow