logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.04.25 2013고단187
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a driver of a passenger car in C.

On October 26, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 19:00, and became a U.S. to move to the opposite lane in accordance with the two-lane road in the New Don-ri, 135-4, the New Don-ri, the Don-ri, the Don-ri, the Don-ri, the Don-ri, the Don-ri, the Defendant

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver, the driver of the motor vehicle, had a duty of care to ensure that the defendant, the driver of the motor vehicle, is obliged to observe the signal and safely see the traffic situation of the opposite lane, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and took part of the E-ray part of the victim D (the 48-year-old driver’s license)’s e-ray drive with the Defendant’s front right part of the vehicle, and caused the said victim to undergo approximately 16 weeks’ medical treatment, such as bovine spongiformiform blood in need of medical treatment, and the victim F (the 49-year-old driver’s age), which requires approximately 2 weeks’ medical treatment, and caused the victim F (the 60-year-old driver’s age), to obtain approximately 3 weeks’ medical treatment from the victim G (the 60-year-old passenger) of the Defendant’s vehicle.

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance for motor vehicles violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Defendant operated the said cushion motor vehicle without purchasing the mandatory insurance for motor vehicles at the aforementioned date and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 46 (2) and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Commercial concurrence;

arrow