The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing or other car.

On March 14, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on March 14, 2019, and driven the two-lane of the two-lane road in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, in a speed that would not be known depending on the E-section from D to E-section.

At the same time, signal lights and crosswalks are installed, so in such cases, there was an obligation to verify whether a person engaged in driving duty is a person who sets the way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the victim G (the 42 years old), the victim H (the 18 years old), the victim I (the 16 years old), and the victim I (the 16 years old, south, and the 16 years old) on the right side of the passenger car of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim G, such as the ele, knee, and fele, requiring approximately 3 weeks of treatment to the victim H, and the tension and tension of the part of which is unknown, and the injury to the victim I, including the fel, fel and fel, requiring approximately 7 weeks of treatment to the victim I.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (free license) driving of the said vehicle from a distance of about 150 meters from the front side of the Haak-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, without a driver’s license, to the place specified in the said paragraph (1).

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall drive any motor vehicle, etc. on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance for motor vehicles;

Nevertheless, the Defendant was holding the said rocketing car and did not subscribe to the mandatory insurance for motor vehicles at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1.