Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a eexton car from around 6 km to the front road of the restaurant among the “house door” located on the 87-lane 21, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with no driver’s license around 00:10 on May 15, 2017, on the same day, around 00:30 on the same day from the front road of the restaurant, which was located on the 87-lane in the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoyang-gu, Seoul to the apartment road.

B. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant seems to have caused interference with the performance of special duties, as stated in the written indictment, “. May 17, 2017” appears to be “962 in the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul around 00:20, the Defendant was required to stop on the right side of the road in order to make additional investigations, such as the implementation of a measuring instrument for drinking alcohol, on the front day of the Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul. As described in the foregoing A., when driving a Esch-ton car while controlling the driving of drinking alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by the victim G (29 years old) who is a policeman belonging to the F of the Bupyeong-gu Police Station, and was required by the damaged person to stop on the right side of the road for additional investigation.

The Defendant was driving with drinking alcohol at the time without a license, and the injured person thought to escape from this situation was demanding a stop of the said car, but he was forced, prompt, and rapid landing of it. The injured person went about about 10 meters on the side of the window of the driver’s seat while driving about 10 meters away from the road floor, and assault the victim’s head head head part away from the floor with the back side of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to the prevention of crimes and criminal investigations using a dangerous object, and caused the injury to the victim, such as sugars without an open two wife for about three weeks in need of treatment.

2. Defendant B is an employee of a construction company run by A.

A As set forth in paragraph 1 above, a police officer who is under the influence of drinking while driving a Esch Rexton car without a driver's license.