beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On July 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced by the Seoul High Court to eight months of imprisonment for fraud aiding and abetting, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Suwon Detention House on August 8, 2017.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On November 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sought a loan from the name infinites who misrepresented the employees of the lending company up to KRW 6 million; and (b) would make a deposit to us for the test if the account is not used; and (c) sought a statement that the account would be returned again if the deposit is made; and (d) although it is anticipated that the account would be used for singing, the account would be given to us without confirming his/her affiliation or position; and (c) notified the account number in B bank account under the name of the Defendant to the above name infinites without confirming his/her affiliation or position.
Around November 25, 2019, the person under whose name the person under whose name the case was false means to misrepresent the D Bank E and call the victim F to the victim F, and “A loan will be made at a low interest rate of 7% if he/she redeems 5.8 million won out of the loans 20 million won inG,” and the victim, on November 25, 2019, remitted 5.8 million won to the B bank account in the name of the Defendant (C) around November 22, 2019.
As a result, the Defendant aided and abetted the Defendant to commit the phishing fraud by providing his account to a person with no name, so that he can use it for the crime of phishing fraud.
2. No one shall intermediate a third party's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.
On September 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) opened the cell phone heart through the Internet search at a closed place; (b) opened the cell phone, and (c) opened the phone heart, and opened the phone name to H, the Defendant had access to the phone site and opened the phone name.