logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고단1152
사기등
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

Ⅰ Summary of the facts charged

1. On March 9, 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B are the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building and the similar fund-raising company established under subparagraph 502, and Defendant A uses the position of “the president” and introduce the most high-profit marketing program for the sale of commodities, and hold a briefing session, etc. In fact, Defendant B is in charge of operating the Fund. Defendant B, as a business director of the F Bank of Korea, is in charge of the overall business affairs of the F Bank of Korea, such as managing the Fund and educating members of the said program. The inside director H and auditor were in charge of managing and educating members.

The Defendants, taking advantage of the fact that it cannot be deemed an act of receiving money in the event of exchanging money through an actual transaction of goods, were in fact a monetary transaction attracting investment money by inviting members. However, even though the value of the use of goods is lower than that of the goods, the Defendants were willing to invite members under the pretext of goods transaction, such as selling goods having no value to purchase, or selling goods with no value to purchase, adding the cost of the goods to the investment money, etc.

Accordingly, the members of the LAF would purchase red ginseng, J, coffee, salt, etc. at KRW 880,00, or purchase smart sirens at KRW 1,500,00,000, or obtain "one code, which is the unit of payment for allowances, if they purchase goods sold by the LAF." The above red ginseng, J, coffee, salt, etc. was less than KRW 100,000,000, and the cost of smart sirens was equivalent to KRW 700,00,000, because members automatically purchased the said goods sold by LAF, there was no difference between 80,000,000, out of the purchase amount of goods, and there was no difference between the investment in the high profit marketing program of LAF.

Any person who violates the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without obtaining authorization or permission under Acts and subordinate statutes in the future.

arrow