logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.04.17 2015가단117889
임금
Text

1. Defendant Newjin-si Co., Ltd.: 226,450 won to Plaintiff A; 441,745 won to Plaintiff B; and each of them on September 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants are general taxi drivers who employ general taxi drivers and engage in passenger transport business under Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Passenger Transport Service Act (hereinafter “passenger Act”).

Plaintiff

A and Plaintiff B were enrolled in Defendant Shinjin-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “newjin-si”) before 2012 and withdrawn from the office on June 2015, and Plaintiff C continued to work on December 2011 after being enrolled in Defendant Shinjin-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Scar”).

B. Through the collective agreement and wage agreement applicable to the Defendants’ workplace, labor and management agreed on September 23, 2009 that the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted in addition to 50% (58,000 won), other than the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted in addition to the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted (42,00 won) that was already paid on September 23, 2009, included in the wage. In addition, from June 1, 2013, the labor and management agreed to pay the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted in the amount of 120,000 won including the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted in the amount of wage from that time to that time, and excluded the amount of value-added tax reduced or exempted from that time

다. 피고들의 2011년도 단체협약 및 임금협정서 제16조에서 근로시간을 “1일 6⅔시간, 1주일 40시간을 기준으로 한다.”고 규정하고 있었는데, 2013. 5. 23. 2011년도 단체협약 및 임금협정서를 변경하는 노사합의를 하면서 2013. 6. 1.부터는 소정 근로시간을 1일 6시간으로 변경하였다. 라.

The minimum wage determined and announced by the Minister of Labor pursuant to the Minimum Wage Act is 4,580 won in 2012, 4,860 won in 2013, 5,210 won in 2014, and 5,580 won in 2015.

E. The actual number of working days of the Plaintiffs is equal to the “number of working days” stated in the attached list, and the Defendants paid the Plaintiffs the amount indicated in the “actual payment” stated in the above list during the working period as wages.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-2, 3, .

arrow