logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.19 2015나52577
임대차보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. On March 4, 2006, the Plaintiff’s assertion concluded a lease agreement with the deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”) on the lease deposit amounting to KRW 10 million, monthly rent, and KRW 900,000,000,000 from March 4, 2006 to be used as the office of G, for which he works as the Secretary General, and paid KRW 10,000,000,000,000 as the lease deposit to the deceased for the second floor office (hereinafter “the lease agreement”). The lease agreement of this case terminated on February 2, 2008 or the expiration of the period of March 3, 2008, and delivered the leased building to the deceased.

Therefore, the deceased is obligated to return the lease deposit to the Plaintiff. Since the deceased died on October 6, 2010, the Defendants, the inheritor of the deceased, are obligated to return the lease deposit to the Plaintiff according to their respective inheritance shares.

B. First of all, we examine whether the lessee of the instant lease contract is the Plaintiff, and examine the records of No. 1-3 as to whether the lessee of the instant lease contract was the Plaintiff. On August 10, 2001, J prepared a lease contract with the Deceased, setting the lease deposit of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from August 15, 2001, and the lease period of KRW 24 months from August 15, 2001. The Plaintiff, who was the Secretary General at the time of G, as to the instant leased building, was the lessee from March 4, 2006 to 24 months from March 4, 206, and the remainder is recognized to have the same content as the lease contract under the above J’s name, but, in other words, the Plaintiff’s entire pleadings are acknowledged as follows.

arrow