logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.12 2016나18455
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The key issue of this case is whether or not the attorney fee is unfairly excessive in light of the defendant's proper performance of delegated duties under the attorney delegation agreement with the plaintiff according to the contract, and the defendant's legal assistance and other activities. The reason why this court should explain is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow