Defendant

A Imprisonment for 8 months, Defendant B's imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant C's fine of 5 million won, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to operate the above game room in such a way that the 50 game machine was installed in the H game room located in the second floor of the building of the building in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the game room was exchanged in cash to customers according to the scores from the operation of the game machine. Defendant A conspired to operate the game room, such as management of the game room, exchange and settlement of accounts, Defendant B’s permission and investment in the game room, Defendant C’s money exchange business, Defendant D and I’s heart names, respectively.

From January 26, 2012 to June 15:40, 2012, the Defendants: (a) had customers enter 500 won in the said game room in an undisclosed game machine installed in the game room; (b) had customers run the card game; and (c) upon the winning of the card slip, the Defendants issued a certificate of custody of points per point 10,000 won, and exchanged 9,000 won after deducting 10% per certificate of custody of the above points to customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange points obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. In the first trial records, each statement made by the defendant A in the trial records (the defendant B shall contain part of the defendant) in the third trial records;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused B and A (including the statement of the accused C);

1. The K's statement;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. The photograph exchanged [Defendant D denies the public offering. However, in relation to accomplices, the public offering is only a combination of two or more persons to realize a crime by co-processing and committing a crime, and the public offering is established in a case where there are several persons in a successive or implicit manner and the combination of their intent is formed. In this case, the defendant C’s act of exchange in addition to the toilet in the game room as well as in the game room (the police against the above defendant).