logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2012.10.10 2012고정684
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

Defendant

A and B fail to pay the above fine, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From April 7, 201 to October 20 of the same month, Defendant A employed a juvenile by allowing the female to provide entertainment services against the customers who found the above main points without verifying the age of J (W, 16, K), L (n, 17, Ma), which was introduced through H’s I at “G” entertainment tavern located in the Daegu Suwon-gu F 3th floor.

2. Defendant B, from April 7, 201 to the 20th day of the same month, had a female to have a guest act against the customers who found the above main point without verifying the age of J (W, 16 years of age, K), L (n, 17 years of age, Ma), which was introduced through H’s I at the “O” entertainment tavern located in the Daegu Suwon-gu N2-gu N2nd day of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. Each legal statement of a witness, L, J and H;

1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol of H by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each prosecutor's statement against L and J;

1. Article 50 Subparag. 2 of the former Juvenile Protection Act (amended by Act No. 11048, Sept. 15, 201) and Article 24(1) of the same Act, each of the applicable provisions on criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, of the provisional payment order;

1. Defendant C, from April 7, 201 to the 20th day of the same month, was employed by Defendant C, without confirming the age of J (W, 16 years of age, name K, 17 years of age, and name M) as a juvenile, which was introduced through H’s entertainment tavern in Qu-gu P, Daegu P, from around April 7, 201 to around the 20th day of the same month, and without confirming the age of J (W, 16 years of age, name K, 17 years of age, and name M).

2. The Defendant alleged that Q entertainment bars were operated from around December 20, 201 to May 201, 201, but there is no other fact that the Defendant did not have L and J as the principal agent and did not allow the entertainment act.

arrow