The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is that C is the chairperson of the representative of the 15th tenant of the Dong-gu Daejeon apartment unit D, and the defendant A is the resident of the above apartment unit.

On June 29, 2016, at around 11:00, seven members, such as E, F, G, H, I, and J, a resident of the apartment complex, were gathered in the office of the second floor representative meeting of the above apartment management office. The complainant who wishes to enter the representative meeting room, demanded the defendant to go home at the representative meeting room of the council, and the defendant demanded that the defendant go home at the representative meeting room of the defendant. Accordingly, the defendant " why why is why is, why is, why is, and why is, why the reason is why is why the defendant's reason is why he or she is left, or why he or she is why he or she is about

In a large sense, the complainant publicly insulting the complainant.

The defendant's reasons for innocence recognizes the fact that he stated in C, such as the facts charged, at the representative conference room where a large number of people gather.

However, in light of the record, C, as the representative of the occupants, divided the stories related to the operation of the tennis in the representative meeting of the apartment complex, and C, as the representative of the apartment complex, entered the representative meeting room to present opinions to C in relation to the operation of the tennis, the Defendant and C, who had frequently a dispute over the ordinary legal system, was a good way to see that C continues to go to the Defendant among the occupants who had entered the representative meeting room, and the Defendant resisted the Defendant as the facts charged, by disregarding C himself, by disregarding the representative meeting room. In particular, C, as the facts charged, “I am feas with the conclusion of the judgment.”

The expression “” was used only once, and the Defendant was not present at the representative conference room, and the occupants, including C and the Defendant, divided about 30 minutes. In the process, it is recognized that the Defendant did not have an insulting speech to C.

The relationship between the defendant and C, the details and frequency of the defendant's remarks, as shown in these facts.