A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on October 18:14, 2017, on the part adjacent to the upper part of the attached area located in Ansan-si, the lower court demanded the Defendant to get off the taxi on the part of the victim B (53 tax) to the taxi in this operation; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was operating on a way different from that of the usual passage.

Therefore, when the injured party stops the vehicle on the front side of the old apartment commercial building in Ansan-si, the defendant did not participate in theization, and the defendant assaulted the injured party, such as 2 times the face of the injured party and 2 times the trees of the injured party by left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to record records of black stuffs video CDs, black stuffs video images;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime again even though he/she had the record of having been sentenced to a fine on several occasions as an assault or bodily injury, the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment

I seem to appear.

In addition, there was no agreement with one victim.

Considering these circumstances, strict punishment is inevitable.

However, the degree of assault is relatively heavy.

The punishment shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the unexpected circumstances.