1. The Seoul Central District Court case 2007Gahap20155, 35270 (merged) against the Defendant’s Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is October 208.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the case of the Seoul Central District Court 2007Gahap20155, 35270 (Joint), the mediation of the damages case of the 28 appointed parties, including the Defendant, C and the 32 other parties (total of 32 parties) filed against Non-party D, E, and the Plaintiff, F, and G5, the Seoul Central District Court 2007Gahap20155, 35270 (Joint), and the mediation protocol was prepared on October 2, 2008 after the voluntary mediation was established and the mediation protocol was prepared on October 2, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant mediation case and”

(2) The defendant and 32 members of the above C et al. are buyers who purchased a penty constructed by the K-si and 9 parcels of land from the K-si and the K-si. The above E shall be the representative director of the K-si and the plaintiff.

The above F and G shall be the family members of the D and the trustee with respect to the land for the new construction and sale project executed by the D and the F and G Co., Ltd.

B. Around January 5, 2009, after the instant conciliation agreement was made on January 5, 2008, the date of the instant conciliation agreement, which was October 2, 2009, the agreement was concluded to substitute the said conciliation agreement with the additional agreement made on January 5, 2009, which was written on October 2, 2009.

(hereinafter “instant additional agreement”) The instant protocol of mediation is written on October 2, 2008, and the additional agreement is written on October 22, 2008.

Accordingly, on October 22, 2008, the part shall be reported as a clerical error in October 2, 2008, and the corresponding part shall be written respectively.

C. The content of the instant conciliation clause and the instant supplementary agreement (the content of the instant adjustment clause that changes the adjustment clause is stated under the pertinent adjustment clause). Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) up to October 22, 2008 to the designated parties in the attached list of the Plaintiffs (Appointed Parties) (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”)

A. Seoul, which is owned by Nonparty J.