1. The defendant's damages case against the plaintiff was dated May 26, 2009 by the Seoul Central District Court 2008Gahap8077.

1. Basic facts

A. The Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap80777 (hereinafter “instant damages lawsuit”) brought by the Defendant against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant damages lawsuit”) rendered a decision to proceed with conciliation on May 26, 2009 (hereinafter “instant compulsory conciliation decision”), which became final and conclusive on June 16, 2009.

The main contents of the instant compulsory adjustment decision are as follows.

1. The plaintiff (the plaintiff in this case is the defendant in this case under the decision of compulsory adjustment, and the defendant in this case is the plaintiff in this case under the decision of compulsory adjustment. To avoid confusion, the defendant in this case and the plaintiff in this case were additionally added only within the table containing the summary of the decision of compulsory adjustment. The plaintiff in the main sentence of the judgment in this case and the defendant in the main sentence of the judgment are the defendant in this case.) shall, with respect to the decision of provisional seizure on June 13, 2008 as to the real estate listed in the attached list 1, allow the applicant creditor company Dae Ji Trust, Inc. to withdraw the provisional seizure application, and the provisional seizure registration completed on June 10, 2009 by the Seoul Central District Court's registry as the receipt of June 13, 2008.

2. The plaintiff (the defendant in this case) is cancelled with the defendant (the plaintiff in this case) within 20 days after the provisional attachment registration under paragraph (1) was cancelled.

A. The registration of ownership transfer completed on September 26, 2002 by the Seoul Central District Court Branch of the Seoul Central District Court as the receipt No. 60078 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached list 1, and

B. As to the portion of 3.94/2,361.7 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 2, each procedure for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer completed as of March 2001 by the same registry office as of September 26, 2002 with respect to the registration of ownership transfer completed as of September 6, 2002 by the receipt No. 6078 of the same registry office and the portion of 1.3/1,073.7 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 3, shall be implemented.

3. By June 20, 2009, the plaintiff (the defendant in this case) stated the defendant (the plaintiff in this case) in attached Tables 1 through 3.