1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant concluded a loan transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with a floating rate of KRW 280,00,000 (a floating rate under Article 3 (2) 2 of the Framework Act on Credit Union Credit Transactions). On February 16, 2015, the Defendant made a loan with a due date of reimbursement of KRW 221,00,000 with respect to D land owned by the Plaintiff (a maximum debt amount of KRW 55,000,000 with a maximum debt amount of KRW 65,000 and KRW 65,000,000 with an additional registration for the establishment of a mortgage. (b) On February 21, 2012, the Defendant concluded a loan agreement with the Plaintiff on the following: (c) the floating rate of KRW 5,00,000 with respect to the establishment of a mortgage (the first interest rate of KRW 7.8% per annum, which shall be less than the maximum debt amount of KRW 2015,505% per annum.).

The following obligations owed by the debtor against the creditors in the past, present and future:

(a) All obligations arising from credit transactions, such as deed loans, bill discount, payment guarantee, sales credit transactions, etc.;

(b) Obligations due to transactions with credit cards (excluding the offer of security by any third party, other than the debtor);

C. Guarantee liability for the above transaction with the creditor and the third party

D. The Plaintiff, in writing, appears to be in writing to be the comprehensive collateral security (for example, the comprehensive collateral security) in this case, although the Plaintiff appears to be a clerical error in writing in the document establishing the right to collateral security (for example, the collateral security).

The contents of the comprehensive collateral are as follows.