logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.03.21 2018고단1832
유가증권위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the charge of forging securities at the Cheongju District Court on August 22, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the official prison on February 27, 2015.

The Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that if the number is the same as one of six numbers in B’s number among the 6 numbers in B’s instant lottery tickets, he would be able to receive the audience fee indicated in B’s “I’B number,” forged it, and tried to receive the audience fee by presenting it to the selling place.

1. On May 9, 2017, from around February 7, 2018, the Defendant forged a lottery ticket, “Stok 200,” which is securities of an amount equivalent to 100 million won in front of a copy of the lottery ticket, in a place where it is not known between the Korea Lottery Commission and the Korea Lottery Commission from around May 9, 2017, and the number column of the stok 23th lottery ticket issued by the Korea Lottery Commission, is considered as “40 stok 200 stok stok200”, which is securities of an amount of 100 million stok stok 200 stok stok stok.

2. On February 7, 2018, the Defendant exercised the forged securities by presenting it to D, who is aware of the forgery, on the 23-time 23-time lottery tickets as described in the above paragraph (1) at the C Lottery Tickets located in Seo-gu, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Seowon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. A forged lottery photography;

1. Cases of response to a request for cooperation in investigation affairs;

1. Original of forged lottery tickets;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment to the same type of decisions), and written judgments; and

1. A statement of criminal records, etc., the defendant alleged that he/she only left the road of this case and did not have forged. However, according to each evidence of the judgment, the following circumstances, i.e., he/she is subject to criminal punishment for the charge of forging securities under the same veterinary law.

arrow