1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company whose business purpose is the publication and sale of a newspaper, and the Defendant is a media company that runs the Internet homepage (htp:/www. www. junes.com).

B. 1) The Defendant’s Internet homepage as the title “A” includes the following (hereinafter referred to as “instant article”) written by the reporters affiliated to the Defendant C, as well as the following:

[See Attached 2] On the 31st day of the last month, the Daejeon Labor Relations Commission published the D Articles 31st day of the month that “a speech that does not change the confusion of reporters or more into money,” and argued that “the private side is trying to give lectures to those who create another publication.” In addition, although it is said that it is a useful publication to the general public, including government offices and institutions, it is nothing more than a level of editing the materials received from the government offices. In fact, this content is whether the general public sees 20,00 won or books only to be useful, and that “It is obvious that the public will have presented the books created as materials for entry to the entrance and exit, and that it is difficult to find that there is no reason to see that there is no reason to 3 weeks from the date of entry into force of June 1 to the date of entry, and that there is no reason to 1 week from the date of entry into force of Daejeon.”