1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 26, 2019, the Defendant posted the [Attachment 2] article (hereinafter “instant article”) on the Defendant’s website (C) as the title D.

B. The article of this case includes the following contents:

(1) A. A., the issue of the destruction of labor by an unfair labor practice in 2011 (hereinafter referred to as “the part of an article”) leads to the introduction of a p.m. strategy against the media organization, which continues to exist. It has been pointed out that: (a) the submission of the position of labor union or the application for a non-discrimination report to the articles disadvantageous to the management, and that the press report will be obstructed; (b) the subject of the claim is any article that actually refers to the “def. of labor union”; (c) the members of the E.m. E. A. member of the E. Union urged the introduction of the two-day series of classes, not the sampling work at night in May 201, and entered the strike.

As a result, A entered a lock-out immediately and mobilized service personnel.

3) The nine years have led to a serious labor-management conflict, which led to a series of labor workers. In March 2016, MFC voluntarily concealed its position before the company’s disciplinary action. At the end, MFC voluntarily discontinued after the withdrawal of MFC. At the end, HC died from cerebrovascular. 4) The National Human Rights Commission of Korea recommended the Plaintiff to negotiate with the hostile self-act dialogue with the Plaintiff at the beginning of this year, but the Plaintiff raised an administrative litigation.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. Part I of an engineer;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is merely requesting a press organization to make a counterargument report for a balanced report, and did not have any intent to obstruct the press organization's report.

The plaintiff did not claim a counterargument report against the whole criticism against several thousand criticisms mentioned in the destruction of the union.

A counterargument report, such as paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1, shall be sought.

B. Determination 1 on the part of “the Plaintiff’s request for a counter-argument of press reports” refers to press reports and remedy for damages.