logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.10 2020나2003954
공사대금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance (including the attached Form), except in a dismissal or supplementary decision as set forth in paragraph (2) below, or in addition or supplementary decision as set forth in paragraph (3). It is without merit by the main sentence of Article 420

2. The ground of appeal No. 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance is examined.

From the 11th to the 8th below the list (from the 11th to the 14th) below the list shall be made in the following parts:

(1) Where a cause falling under any subparagraph of Article 25 (3) occurs within the contract period, the other party to the contract shall immediately file an application for extension of the contract period with the public official in charge of contracts and the construction supervisor in writing, along with the amended process table for Article 17 (1) 2, before the contract period expires.

Provided, That where the ground for extension expires after the expiration of the contract period due to the occurrence of the contract period, the application for extension of the contract period and the application for adjustment of contract amount under paragraph (4) shall be filed immediately after the

The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is 2-B.

The 14th (the 11th (the 11th) of this paragraph shall be deleted.

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is 3-A.

From the third to the fourth (the third to the second (the third) portion of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party (amended by Presidential Decree No. 28690, Mar. 6, 2018; hereinafter referred to as the "former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party") shall be used as the "Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party", and the part of the "former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party" shall be further referred to as the "Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is 3-A.

Under this paragraph, the term "indirect construction cost" shall be replaced by the term "indirect construction cost", which shall be nine (9) below, with "indirect construction cost".

3-B of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

1) Paragraph 3 shall have the opportunity to take the third (the nineth).

arrow