All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment) with respect to the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.

2. The Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case during the period of repeated crime even though he had a lot of records of punishment for the same kind of crime, including multiple sentences sentenced to punishment, again during the period of repeated crime.

For reasons that it is difficult to understand that he/she did not have any interview during his/her life, he/she suffered injury to the victims after being released from the military, interfered with his/her duties, and the alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of drinking driving is very high, and he/she did not receive any breath from the victim H.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the facts charged and agreed with the victims of the crime of intrusion and bodily injury and interference with business.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, occupation, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.