All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. On the summary of the reasons for appeal, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant is too unfasible to the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment), and that the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.

2. In the case of the accused, the accused has been punished three times as a result of driving under drinking or refusing to take measurements of drinking (each fine), and the accused has caused a traffic accident while driving under the 2016 highest order of 2004 high order of 2004 high order of 201. The accused has sustained an injury in need of eight weeks of medical treatment.

Of the blood of this case, alcohol concentration is very high as 0.215%.

However, the defendant is against the charge, and the vehicle of this case is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and both the thief victim and the victim of the traffic accident agreed.

Although the defendant was guilty of the same theft, he was punished by around 1981 and around 1984.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, occupation, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.